The Relationship Between Reliability (Rxx) and Validity (Rxy) Coefficients[1]

 

By

 

Billy J. McCroskey, Ph.D.

 

Given two independent predictors of the same criterion, the predictor with the higher reliability will also have the higher validity coefficient. Reliability coefficients tend to be greater than validity coefficients because reliability places an upper limit on validity. The rule for maximum possible validity due to the upper limit placed on it by reliability is: The correlation between the predictor and independent criterion can never be higher than the square root of the product of the reliability of the predictor and the reliability of the criterion. For purposes of understanding and comparing Reliability (Rxx) and Validity (Rxy) coefficients, the table below best illustrates their relationship in terms of equivalent ranges and magnitude.[2]

 

RELIABILITY            VALIDITY                 VERBAL SCALE EQUIVALENTS

0.97-0.99+                   0.70-0.99+                         Extremely High

0.94-0.96                     0.60-0.69                           Very High

0.90-0.93                     0.50-0.59                           High

0.80-0.89                     0.40-0.49                           Moderate

0.70-0.79                     0.30-0.39                           Low

0.00-0.69                     0.00-0.29                           Does not meet the Scientific Standard[3]

Maximum Possible Validity = SQRT[Rxx(Predictor) times Rxx(Criterion)]

 

Table 2: Correlational Analysis of Software Estimates of Transferability of Skills Relative to N=115 IARP Vocational Expert Participants' Estimates of Transferability[4]

                                                Spearman’s Rho                               

Software Package                  N             Predictive Validity Coefficient      p-Value

MVQSTM MTSP 2003TM         56                             0.56                                    0.00

VolcanoTM 4.1 MTS-R[5]         56                             0.48                                    0.00

VolcanoTM 4.1 MTS-O[6]         56                             0.39                                    0.00

SkillTranTM                                     63                             0.27                                    0.03

Control                                    31                             0.00                                    0.00

OASYSTM                                          62                            -0.15                                    0.26

LifeStepTM                              26                            -0.21                                    0.31

 

The Dunn, et. al. TSA study was based on an Injured Worker with typical back restrictions in Bexar County, Texas.

 

In a second TSA study based on 10 Non-Injured Workers[7] completed at the same Fall 2003 IARP Conference, Grimley, Lowe, Williams and Hahn (2004) found:

 

Table 3: Pearson R Predictive Validity Coefficients

 

Marked correlations are significant at p < .05000

 

Sampling Distribution: N=50 Job TSAs rated by 79 Vocational Experts (VE)

 

TSA System

Predictive Validity Coefficients

 

 

 

MVQS MTSP 2003-R[8]

0.96

 

 

 

Volcano 4.1 MTS-R

0.91

 

 

 

Volcano 4.1 MTS-O

0.89

 

 

 

Volcano 4.1 SSTS-R

0.76

 

 

 

Volcano 4.1 SSTS-O

0.73

 

 

 

Volcano 4.1 VQ-R

0.50

 

 

 

Control

0.04

 

 

Note: Job #'s Served as the Control Group and IARP Vocational

          Expert (VE) Job TSA Ratings were the Criterion.

 

Summary and Conclusions

 

In the two IARP TSA Validy Studies (See Tables 2 & 3 above), MVQS Job-Person Matching TSA Levels from MTSP 2003 and Volcano 4.1 were found to be valid relative to Vocational Expert Ratings at the Fall 2003 IARP Conference in San Antonio, TX. These scientific findings support the High Reliability and High to Extremely High Face, Content, Predictive and Construct Validity of MVQS 2003 and Volcano 4.1 products for use with both injured and non-injured workers. Results generalize to MVQS2005.02 and Volcano 5.02 programs.

 

MVQS 2005.02 and Volcano 5.02 Product Costs (Separately & Bundled Together)[9]

 

MVQS 2005.02 (McDOT, McPLOT and MTSP) Program Package         $2,680.00

Volcano 5.02 Program Package                                                                    $1,415.00

Four 30-hour CEU Training Courses Package                                             $   660.00

All Program Packages Bundled together (Save $1,530.00)                         $3,225.00

 

Contact:                                               `                            Dr. Billy J. McCroskey

8209 Halifax Court North

Brooklyn Park, MN 55443-2538

Ph: 763-569-0680

 


When using the MVQS2005 Programs, General Labor Market Access (GLMA) should not be included, when considering, calculating and determining a reasonable opinion with respect to % of Vocational Disability. Instead, it is recommended that Specific Labor Market Access (SLMA) relative to specific post-injury job type matches and their associated wage estimates, be included when considering, calculating and determining a reasonable opinion with respect to % of Vocational Disability.

 

In terms of MVQS2005 Programs, % of Vocational Disability and Loss of Earning Capacity are assumed to be synonymous. The recommended formula for calculating the relative % of Vocational Disability for a given injured worker undergoing MVQS Vocational Analysis is:

 

(PreInjEarningCapacityEstimate - PostInjEarningCapacityEstimate) / PreInjEarningCapacityEstimate

 

In MVQS Programs, General Labor Market Access (GLMA) is a reasonably controlled variable. It is controlled through the use of "frequently-hired-for" area job bank databases covering c. 92% of the available Specific Job Types in the Relevant Labor Market of Interest (RLMI). MVQS Volcano area job bank databases account for c. 92% of the available job openings for Specific Job Types available in the RLMI. As such, GLMA estimates reported in selected MVQS Vocational Analysis Reports are assumed to be reasonable at the Specific Job Type Level. Therefore, GLMA estimates are not moderator variables, and should not be considered part of any % of Vocational Disability calculation(s) stemming from the use of MVQS Volcano 5.01 Pre/Post-Injury wage estimates. Instead, one should consider and focus on Specific Labor Market Access (SMLA) in terms of Specific Job-Person Job Type Matches, as moderator variables, which do impact on % of Vocational Disability (Loss of Earning Capacity) considerations.

 

Theoretically, in lieu of a set of better, more reasonable, indicators, the single best, most reasonable, % of Vocational Disability Estimate would be the average, or mid-point, across all possible sets of such Pre/Post-Injury Earning Capacity Estimates, within known SEE error limits. For known SEE error limits associated with MVQS 2005 earning capacity estimates across specific job types, see McCroskey, Hahn & Dennis [Journal of Forensic Vocationology (JOFV), Vol. 6(1), Fall, 2000, pp. 107-134; See also, the MVQS2001Resources.doc, pp. 73-99; and the JOFV (7)1, 2002, pp. 128-157 (Linear Regression) and pp. 158-178 (Curvilinear Regression) VQ-Wage Studies].

 

Things to Consider:

 

Support for the MVQS2005 Pre-Injury Earning Capacity Estimate you may select, typically, but not always (depending on the specific facts in the case), comes from calculated annual hourly earnings (based on the latest pre-injury full year's worth of wages divided by 2080 hours in a standard work year).

 

Support for the MVQS2005 Post-Injury Earning Capacity Estimate(s) you may select, typically, but not always (depending on the specific facts in the case), comes from estimated annual hourly earnings. Such earnings should be based on an assumed post-injury full year's worth of wages associated with specifically selected reasonable job types from the client's post-injury available job match options divided by 2080 hours in a standard work year). Support for specifically selected job types and their associated wage estimates, typically comes from local labor market surveys designed to confirm the existence of, and identify typical wages associated with, such selected job types in the relevant labor market(s) of interest. (See Occupational Density estimates in Volcano 5.01).

 

The existence of available residual Transferable Skills for specific post-injury job type options, along with their level of job difficulty as measured by the Vocational Quotient (VQ) and the availability and length of any Specific Vocational Preparation (SVP; either formal, in-formal, or on-the-job training), necessary to bridge the gap between where the client currently is and where (s)he would need to be (in order to gain access to selected potential post-injury job options), would be moderator variables, which would most certainly impact on access to such specifically selected jobs and ultimately, access to the post-injury earning capacity data point(s) selected.

 

In cases where there is an absence of residual Transferable Skills, demonstrated client Values Agreement relative to specific post-injury job type options, along with their level of job difficulty as measured by the Vocational Quotient (VQ) level of Overall Job Difficulty and the availability and length of any Specific Vocational Preparation (SVP; either formal, in-formal, or on-the-job training), necessary to bridge the gap between where the client currently is, and where (s)he would need to be (in order to gain access to the selected potential post-injury job options), are moderator variables which would most certainly impact on access to such specifically selected jobs and ultimately, the post-injury earning capacity data point(s) selected.


Volcano 5.02 Percent of Vocational Disability based on Future Diminished Earning Capacity Los Angeles, CA Labor Market Area Year 2005 Example

 

Date of Birth: 01/01/1970.

Client Work History: 1) Automobile Mechanic (Primary), and 2) Automobile-Repair-Service Estimator (Secondary).

Work-related Injury: Low Back Injury. Auto Mechanic no longer Matches; Service Esitmator still a TSA Job Match.

Pre-Injury Earning Capacity (EC):  50th %ile Earning Capacity (EC) for Auto Mechanic in Los Angeles, CA in 2005

Post-Injury EC Assumption:  25th %ile EC for Automobile-Repair-Service Estimator in Los Angeles, CA in 2005

 

1) Locate Automobile Mechanic – Add to Work History

 

2) Left-click 3)Select & Choose Pre-Injury Earning  Capacity at 50th $ile


 

3) Locate Automobile-Repair-Service Estimator – Add to Work History

 

4) Left-click 3)Select & Choose Post-Injury Earning Capacity at 25th $ile


5) Analyze VDARE High Across Work History

 

6) Inpact Medical Disability on VDARE High Across Worker Traits Profile


7) Left-click Part 2: Button #6)Calculate % of Vocational Disability

 

8) Type in Client Name and Date Of Birth, and

9) Left Click Date of Analysis, Date To Begin Loss, Compute and Pres Value of Total Loss / Percent of Vocational Disability, then ZReport1 to Print Report.


10) Print ZReport1.rtf:  % of Vocational Disability Report

 

      Client Name: John Doe

     ZReport1.rtf: FUTURE DIMINISHED EARNING CAPACITY (DEC)

         FileName: C:\ZReport1.rtf)

    Analysis Date: 07/20/2005

    Date of Birth: 01/01/1970

              Age: 35.55

 

 Occupation (Pre): 620261010 Automobile Mechanic

 Yearly Earning Capacity (EC): $    53206.40 Hourly: $     25.58

   Pre Standard Error Estimate (SEe):               1.32 Dollars

       Pre County: Los Angeles                       

        Pre State: California

  Pre GeoLoc ECLR:   1.1768

 

 Occupation(Post): 620261018 Automobile-Repair-Service Estimator

 Yearly Earning Capacity (EC): $    34964.80 Hourly: $     16.81

  Post Standard Error Estimate (SEe):               1.10 Dollars

      Post County: Los Angeles                       

       Post State: California

 Post GeoLoc ECLR:   1.1768

 

 Date to Begin Loss (DTBL):  07/20/2005   Age: 35.55

    Date for Present Value:  07/20/2005   Age: 35.55

 

                PastLoss (Exclusive of Benefits):         0.00

 PastLoss+Fringe Benefits (For Immediate Payout):         0.00

 

    Fringe Benefits (FB) to Pay Ratio:  27.53%, 2005

                     Wage Growth Year:   2005

           Real Wage Growth (WG) Rate:   0.98 Percent

              Real Interest (RI) Rate:   2.83 Percent

                    Net Discount Rate:   1.85 Percent

 

                    Age to begin Loss:  35.55

          Future Work Life Expectancy:  30.45

                       Hours Per Year:   2080

               Assumed Retirement Age:     66

 

   Future Diminished Earning Capacity (DEC+WG+FB):   825128.06

  Pres Valu of Future Diminished Earning Capacity:             543697.11

                          Past Loss with Benefits:                  0.00

       Discount Adjustment for Date To Begin Loss:                  0.00

 Pres Valu Past & Future Loss (PL+FB)+(DEC+WG+FB):             543697.11

 

                 PERCENT OF VOCATIONAL DISABILITY:       34.28

 

 

 

 

 

                 (c) 1984-2005 by Billy J. McCroskey, Ph.D.

                             All Rights Reserved           


Volcano 5.02 Attachments

 

Report1: High Across Past Relevant Work History (VDARE MLD)           

   BASIS: Vocational Diagnosis and Assessment of Residual Employability

          (VDARE) Maximum Least Demonstrated (MLD) Worker Trait Profile

   Primary GeoLocation: California

 Secondary GeoLocation: Los Angeles                       

                  Year: 2005

        Wage Inflation:    1.0689

      GeoLocation ECLR:    1.1768

       Openings Cutoff:    1

             File Name: C:\JobsDOT.rtf     Worker Traits Requirements S

                                                        PD1-6 EC1-7   V

 DOT Code  DOT Title (OccDiversity)          RMLSPQKFMEC1234561234567 P

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

 620261010 Automobile Mechanic               433432334223001011000101 7

 620261018 Automobile-Repair-Service Estimat 433323223212001111000000 7

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Maximum Least Demonstrated Worker Traits:-> 433433334223001111000101 7

                                                                      

  LMA R1: LABOR MARKET ACCESS Occupational Diversity & Density Measures

   BASIS: Vocational Diagnosis and Assessment of Residual Employability

          (VDARE) Maximum Least Demonstrated (MLD) Worker Trait Profile

   Primary GeoLocation: California

 Secondary GeoLocation: Los Angeles                       

                  Year: 2005

       Openings Cutoff:    1

                                                                      

 1) VDARE MLD LABOR MARKET ACCESS to DOT Title Matches                

    Available DOT Titles                                    :     12972

    Accessible DOT Titles                                   :      2084

    * Percent Relative Standard Error of DOT Title Matches  :    2.66%

 Accessible Titles as a Percent of Available DOT Titles     :   16.07

                                                                      

 2) VDARE MLD LABOR MARKET ACCESS to Expected Yearly Openings         

    Available Yearly Openings                               :    968536

    Accessible Yearly Openings                              :    287084

    * Percent Relative Standard Error of Yearly Openings    :    2.26%

 Accessible Openings as a Percent of Available Openings     :   29.64

                                                                       

 3) VDARE MLD LABOR MARKET ACCESS to Expected Current Employment      

    Available Current Employment                            :   2983898

    Accessible Current Employment                           :    884458

    * Percent Relative Standard Error of Current Employment :    2.26%

 Accessible Employment as a Percent of Available Employment :   29.64

 


Report2: DOT Title Matches by MVQS Transferable Skills % (MTS) Sort  

   BASIS: Vocational Diagnosis and Assessment of Residual Employability

          (VDARE) Residual Employability Profile (REP) Evaluative Data

   Primary GeoLocation: California

 Secondary GeoLocation: Los Angeles                       

                  Year: 2005

        Wage Inflation:    1.0689

      GeoLocation ECLR:    1.1768

       Openings Cutoff:    1

             File Name: C:\JobsDOT.rtf                   OccDensity   

                                       Transferable     Expectancies  

                                      Skills Percent  Yearly   Current

 DOT Code  DOT Title (OccDiversity)   MTS  SSTS  SVP Openings  Employed

 =====================================XXX==============================

 620261018 Automobile-Repair-Service  100   100   7       168       517

 620684018 Brake Adjuster              77    67   2         9        29

 825381026 Electrical Inspector        50    67   7       541      1667

 559381014 Rubber Tester               47    50   6         3         8

 825381014 Automatic-Window-Seat-and   47    67   4         4        13

 822261026 Testing-and-Regulating Te   46    67   7        10        31

 706361014 Assembly Inspector          45    50   5         6        19

 822361030 Trouble Locator, Test Des   45    67   6         4        11

 729381010 Electrical-Equipment Test   44    67   6         8        25

 701261010 Quality-Control Inspector   44    33   6        14        44

 807267010 Shop Estimator              44    83   6         5        15

 619364010 Inspector I                 42    50   6         5        14

 609684010 Inspector, General          40    50   4       326      1003

 =====================================XXX==============================

 

 

MVQS 2005.02 and Volcano 5.02 Product Costs (Separately & Bundled Together)[10]

 

MVQS 2005.02 (McDOT, McPLOT and MTSP) Program Package         $2,680.00

Volcano 5.02 Program Package                                                                    $1,415.00

Four 30-hour CEU Training Courses Package                                             $   660.00

All Program Packages Bundled together (Save $1,530.00)                         $3,225.00

 

Contact:                                                                           Dr. Billy J. McCroskey

8209 Halifax Court North

Brooklyn Park, MN 55443-2538

Ph: 763-569-0680

 



[1] For more on Reliability and Validity: See Cronbach, Lee J., Essentials of Psychological Testing, 2nd ed., Harper & Brothers, New York, 1960, p. 141. See also, Guilford, J. P., Fundamental Statistics, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965, pp. 438-462. See also, StatSoft, Inc. (1998). Statistica. [a Computer Program]. Tulsa, OK: Author.

[2] McCroskey, B. J. & Hahn, S. J. (1998). The Vocational Quotient (VQ) as a Predictor of Earning Capacity: 1996-97 Criterion-Referenced Validity Follow-up Studies. Journal of Forensic Vocationology, 4(1), p. 26.

[3] Does not meet or exceed the Confidence Standard for "Scientific" Reasonable Vocational Expert Certainty.

[4] Dunn, P., Williams, J. & Bast S. (2004). A Comparison of Intuitive and Computer-Generated Estimates of Skill Transferability. A Predictive Validity For TSA Systems relative to Vocational Expert TSA Ratings at the Fall 2003 IARP Conference in San Antonio, Tx, Using Spearman’s Rho. (Unpublished Manuscript – Updated with MVQS MTSP 2003 and Volcano MTS-R Values).

[5] MVQS MTSP 2003 & MTS-R ( McCroskey Transferable Skills 100 point Ratio Scales) were data mined and added for comparison.

[6] MTS-O = McCroskey Transferable Skills Ordinal scale (the MTS-R ratio scale reduced to a 5-point ordinal scale).

[7] Grimley, Cynthia P., Lowe, Jan K., Williams, John M. & Hahn, S. J. (2004). Analysis of IARP 2003 Vocational Expert (VE) Criterion Sampling Distribution TSA Ratings Predicted by Volcano 4.1 Transferable Skills Analysis (TSA) Estimates. Unpublished Manuscript.

[8] Exerpted from the 2000 ABVE Study for comparison with IARP Study Results. See, Grimley, C. P., Williams, J. M., Hahn, S. J. & Dennis, K L. (2000). Scientific Prediction of Transferable Skills. Journal of Forensic Vocationology, 6(1), pp. 7-16.

[9] MVQS 2005.02 prices subject to change with or without prior notice. Call 763-569-0680 for the most current prices.

[10] MVQS 2005.02 prices subject to change with or without prior notice. Call 763-569-0680 for the most current prices.